Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48088 (RAJ)

VIRENDRA SINGH YADAV S/O GENDA LAL YADAV v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/17970/2025 · 2025-11-24

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47748] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17970/2025 1. Virendra Singh Yadav S/o Genda Lal Yadav, Aged About 53 Years, R/o A-29 (A) Jawahar Nagar, Dist. Bharatpur, At Present Posting Saheed Constable Jagdish Chandra Gsss Dahra (Nadbai), Bharatpur. 2. Kamal Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Penghor Nagla Saman, Post Penghor, Tehsil Kumher, Dist. Bharatpur, Raj. At Present Posting Gsss Burana, Block Roopwas, Dist. Bharatpur. 3. Ashok Kumar Bansal S/o Hajari Lal Bansal, Aged About 55 Years, R/o B-162, Jawahar Nagar, Bharatpur, Raj. At Present Posting Gsss Gadi, Block Roopwas, Dist. Bharatpur. 4. Sandeep Sogarwal S/o Hari Singh, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Jaghina, Tehsil And Dist. Bharatpur, Raj. At Present Posting Adeo, Office Of District Education Officer Headquarter Secondary Education, Bharatpur. 5. Surendra Singh Rathore S/o Sumer Singh Rathore, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Village Chanwandiya Khurd, Tehsil Raipur, District Pali, At Present Posting Gsss Dhani, Block Bali, District Pali. 6. Narayan Singh Rathore S/o Shri Roop Singh Rathore, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Rajputo Ka Bass, Padarli, Sindhal, Tehsil Rani, District Pali. 7. Praveen Singh S/o Padam Singh, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Vpo Bera, Tehsil Bali, Dist. Pali, At Present Posting Ggsss Nana , Block Bali, Dist. Pali. 8. Dalpat Singh S/o Shivnath Singh, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Vpo Bera, Tehsil Bali, Dist. Pali, Raj. At Present Posting Gups Kumtiya Bhagal, Block Bali, Dist. Pali. 9. Ranjeet Singh Rao S/o Girdhari Lal Rao, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Vpo Nana, Tehsil Bali, Dist. Pali, Raj. At Present Posting Gsss Thandiveri, Dist. Sirohi. 10. Praveen Kumar Dave S/o Sankleshwar Dave, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Bhatund, Via Sewari, Dist. Pali, Raj. At Present Posting Shri Shambhavnath Gsss Bera, Block Bali, Dist. Pali. [2025:RJ-JP:47748] (2 of 4) [CW-17970/2025] 11. Durgesh Kumar Trivedi S/o Mohan Lal Trivedi, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Varaha Mata Gali Se Sena Road Bhatund, Dist. Pali At Present Posting Gsss Sena, Block Bali, Dist. Pali. 12. Raj Narayan Mathur S/o Kailash Narayan Mathur, Aged About 59 Years, R/o 1-B-12, Kudi Bhagtasani Housing Board, Jodhpur At Present Posting As Gsss Nandwan, District Jodhpur, ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Department Of Education, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner 3. The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner 4. The Joint Director, Education Department, Udaipur Zone Bharatpur. 5. The Joint Director, Education Department, Udaipur Zone Pali. 6. The Joint Director, Education Department, Udaipur Zone Jodhpur. 7. The District Elementary Officer (Secondary/ Elementary), Bharatpur. 8. The District Elementary Officer (Secondary/ Elementary), Pali. 9. The District Elementary Officer (Secondary/ Elementary), Sirohi. 10. The District Elementary Officer (Secondary/ Elementary), Jodhpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sukraj Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : [2025:RJ-JP:47748] (3 of 4) [CW-17970/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 24/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer: “It is, therefore, humbly and respectfully prayed that this writ petition of the petitioners may kindly be allowed: A. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, may kindly be direct the respondents to grant the benefit of ACP and others service benefits to the petitioners by counting their service from the date of their initial appointment with all consequential benefits; B. Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners. Writ petition filed by the petitioners may kindly be allowed with costs.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 10.07.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13104/2025 “Kavita Solanki Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.” submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Kavita Solanki (supra) passed by this Court, on the basis of judgments in case of Yogesh Kumar Pareek Vs. State of Rajasthan: S.B. CWP No. 3534/2009 decided on 20.01.2014. [2025:RJ-JP:47748] (4 of 4) [CW-17970/2025] 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Kavita Solanki (supra) and Yogesh Kumar Pareek Vs. The State of Rajasthan: SBCWP No. 3534/2009 on 20.01.2014 with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /204