[2025:RJ-JP:43400] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16196/2025 Shubham Teli S/o Velji Teli, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Behind Nagar Dharmshala, Teliwara, Banswara, Rajasthan Posted At Tehasil Revenue Accountant, District Collector Banswara, At Present On Training At Revenue Research And Training Institute, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Principal Secretary Energy Department , Govt. Of Rajasthan, Vidhyut Bhawan, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. The Chairman And Managing Director, Rajasthan Rajya Vidhyut Utpadan Nigam Limited, Vidhyut Bhawan, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 3. The Chief Personnel Officer, Rajasthan Rajya Vidhyut Utpadan Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 4. The Deputy Director (Personnel And Admin), Generation Circle, Rajasthan Rajya Vidhyut Utpadan Nigam Limited, Vidhyut Nagar Bansara (Rajasthan) 5. The Deputy Chief Engineer, Generation Circle, Rajasthan Rajya Vidhyut Utpadan Nigam Limited, Vidhyut Nagar, Banswara (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gitesh Joshi Mr. Vageesh Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 29/10/2025 1. Instant petition is preferred by petitioner aggrieved from order dated 17.01.2025 whereby the respondents have [2025:RJ-JP:43400] (2 of 3) [CW-16196/2025] demanded ₹80,104/- as recoverable amount in lieu of period of notice. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that after being successful in diret recruitment relating to Junior Accountant and TRA, 2023 the petitioner has served a notice of three months on 23.08.2024, as per condition No.7 of appointment order dated 16.08.2017, which completed on 20.11.2024 but the petitioner has not received any appointment letter for post of TRA, therefore he has submitted another letter dated 11.11.2024 indicating that the period of three months notice be extended till 18.02.2025. In the meanwhile, on 10.01.2025, the Revenue Board, Ajmer has issued appointment letter to petitioner. The petitioner was relieved by the respondents subject to deposit of emoluments of notice period. He also submits that in identical situation, Bhushan and other persons were relieved by the respondents without serving a notice of 90 days or deposition of pay in lieu of notice thus respondents have discriminated the petitioner while relieving from their department. 3. Having considered submissions and also material placed on record, it is appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation with direction to respondents to decide the representation, in considering an example as referred hereinabove. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all [2025:RJ-JP:43400] (3 of 3) [CW-16196/2025] grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of example as referred hereinabove but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the direction to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /32