Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4808 (AP)

Poola Sunanda Devi, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/2119/2025 · 2025-02-05

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010037692025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 2119/2025 Between: Poola Sunanda Devi, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. BALAJI MEDAMALLI 2. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of the writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents particularly respondents 3 and 4 at the instance of respondents 5 and 7 in insisting her to appear before their authority and yield to the terms of respondents 5 and 7 by 2 handing over some portion of petitioners site property of 300 Sq Yards in D No 6/363 of Railway Kodur Village and Mandal Annamayya District Erstwhile Cuddapa District as illegal irregular and irrational and issued without any authority of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents particularly 4th respondent not to interfere in any manner with her possession over petitioner aforesaid house site property and pass such...” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the State. 3. Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the State on written instructions would submit that as per the preliminary enquiry of the Police, it is a civil dispute between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent Nos.5 to 7 and they will not interfere with the civil dispute between the parties and all the other allegations made in the affidavit are not true and correct. 4. Submissions made by learned Assistant Government Pleader are placed on record. 5. In that view of the matter, this Court is of the considered opinion that the Writ Petition can be closed at the stage of admission itself, without going into merits of the case, by directing 3 the respondents/Police to follow due procedure established under law, if they intend to call the petitioners to the Police Station, in connection with any crime or enquiry. 6. Accordingly, Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. _______________________ ___ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 05.02.2025 RMD/PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 2119 of 2025 Date: 05.02.2025 RMD/PSA