1 2025:CGHC:52105-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3197 of 2025 Tejram @ Satish Jayaswal S/o Late Mendani Jayaswal Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Bhaisama, P.S. Urga, Tahsil And District Korba, Chhattisgarh, Present Address Deepka And Q.No. 502, Civil And Revenue, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Officer In Charge, Police Station Deepka, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. 2. Anjana Jaiswal D/o Late Dwarika Jaiswal, W/o Tejram @ Satish Jayaswal R/o Village, Post, Police Station, Tahsil And District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Love Kumar Ramteke, Advocate For Respondents/ State: Mr. Shashank Thakur, Dy. A.G. Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 27/10/2025 1. Heard Mr. Love Kumar Ramteke, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Shashank Thakur, learned Dy. A.G. for JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.10.28 12:02:47 +0530 2 the respondents/ State. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following prayer:- “ It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the FIR No. 10/2017 dated 20/01/2017 registered by Police Station Deepka, Charge Sheet No. 06/2018 dated 24/01/2018 and the Hon'ble Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katghora, District-Korba, Chhattisgarh, has taken cognizance of the offences under Sections 420, 419,463, 468, 467, 468, 471, 494, 495, 497, 192, 199, 194, 196, 198, 200 IPC against the petitioner, the next hearing of which is on 26/09/2025, in the interest of justice.” 3. From perusal of the prayer and pleadings made in the present petition, it transpires that admittedly, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner and cognizance of the offence has been taken by the learned trial Court. The petitioner has prayed for quashing of the FIR, charge-sheet, and the proceedings pending before the learned trial Court. However, in the opinion of this Court, the prayer is defective as the order taking cognizance has not been challenged which shows that the prayer drafted by learned counsel for the petitioner is in a casual manner. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission 3 of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. 5. Learned State counsel has no objection. 6. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, subject to depositing a sum of Rs. 2,000/- as cost by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court for wasting precious time of the court and producing the receipt of the same at the time of filing of the fresh petition, if any. The said amount shall be transmitted to the Special School for intellectually Handicapped Girls, District Narayanpur C.G. 7. Certified copies of the documents, if any, may be returned to the petitioner after retaining photocopies of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Jyoti