HAFIZ MOHAMMAD S/O BUNDU KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/11394/2025 · 2025-11-01
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48076 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48076 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43827] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11394/2025 Hafiz Mohammad S/o Bundu Khan, Aged About 69 Years, R/o A- 8, Girls School Road, Near Mosque, Gulazar Bagh, P.s. Kotwali District Tonk Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Tonk Rajasthan). ----Accused-Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Non-Applicant For Applicant(s) : Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman For Non-Applicant(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rahul Kumar Sharma for Mr. Manish Singh Mr. Ajay Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 01/11/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 200/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali District Tonk for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1) of BNS, 2023.
2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that father-in-law is the applicant, who in fit of rage has harmed daughter-in-law and two grand children. It is submitted that albeit there are multiple injuries but the same are simple in nature and not life threatening. It is submitted that applicant is 69 years of age, having no criminal antecedent, is behind custody from a period of approximately four months and is presently in hospital.
[2025:RJ-JP:43827] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11394/2025]
3.
Learned counsel for the complainant as well as learned Public Prosecutor have stoutly objected the instant bail application.
4. Heard and considered.
5. Considering that the alleged act was in fit of rage; that the nature of injuries is simple; that the applicant is a man of elderly age, and taking note of the overall facts and without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail with an additional condition that applicant restrain himself directly or indirectly to affect the life of victim in question.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Hafiz Mohammad S/o Bundu Khan shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/24