- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5355 WP No. 107073 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 107073 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. RAMAPPA A/S/O NINGAPPA KURABAR, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. HAVELI VILLAGE, TQ: AND DIST. BAGALKOT-587 101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.C.HUKKERI., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, UPPER KRISHNA PROJECT, NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOT-587 101. 2. THE SPL. LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER, UKP BAGALKOT, DIST. BAGALKOT-587 101. 3. REHABILITATION OFFICER, BAGALKOT TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOT-587 101. REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY. 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, BTDA, NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN.K.UPPAR., AGA FOR R1-2; SRI. G.K.HIREGOUDAR., ADVOCATE R3) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5355 WP No. 107073 of 2023 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.M.C.Hukkeri., counsel for the petitioner, Sri.Praveen K.Uppar., AGA for the respondents 1 and 2 and Sri.G.K.Hiregoudar., counsel for respondent No.3 have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing respondent No.3 to consider the representation dated 23.06.2023 submitted by the petitioner vide Annexure-E. 3. Heard the arguments and perused the writ papers with care. 4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a mandamus may be ordered directing respondent No.3 to consider the representation dated 23.06.2023 submitted by the petitioner vide Annexure-E. AGA submits that an appropriate order may be passed. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5355 WP No. 107073 of 2023 5. A Mandamus is ordered directing respondent No.3 to consider the representation dated 23.06.2023 submitted by the petitioner vide Annexure-E in accordance with the law, within six weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order, if not already considered. 6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26