RUDRA PRATAP SINGH CHAUHAN v. STATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/12527/2025 · 2025-04-24
Saral Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48070 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48070 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:63876 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12527 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rudra Pratap Singh Chauhan Respondent :- State Of Up And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sharad Chand Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pratik Chandra Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
1. Heard Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has prayed for the following relief:
"(i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to correct and substitute the petitioner's mother name as 'Anita Singh' and petitioner's father name as 'Sushil Kumar Singh' in place of mother's name 'Nitu Singh' and father's name 'Sushil Singh Chauhan' on the certificate-cum-marksheet and issue the amended mark-sheet within stipulated period fixed by the Hon'ble Court. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent authorities to decide the representation dated 10.08.2024 of the petitioner within stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble Court. (iii) Issue any other writ, order or direction in the nature of writs, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper to meet ends of justice. (iv) Award the cost of this writ petition to the petitioner."
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has passed High School Examination in the year 2018 and Intermediate Examination in the year 2020, but in the High Schoo certificate- cum-marksheet as well as in Intermediate certificate-cum- marksheet, the name of his mother and father have been wrongly mentioned as 'Nitu Singh' in place of 'Anita Singh' and 'Sushil Singh Chauhan' in place of 'Sushil Kumar Singh'. In this respect, petitioner filed representation to the concerned respondent, which is still pending and no decision has yet been taken. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith a certified copy of this order raising all grievances before the respondent no.2-Secretary, U.P. Board (Secondary Education and Senior Secondary Education) at Prayagraj within a period of one month from today.
In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of two months thereafter from the date he receives representation of the petitioner . Order Date :- 25.4.2025 NS Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad