Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48068 (RAJ)

YASHWANT GOYAL SON OF MOHAN LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/7022/2025 · 2025-11-27

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7022/2025 Yashwant Goyal Son of Mohan Lal, Resident Of Bhopal By Aklera, Tehsil Aklera, District Jhalawar Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Rajesh Saxena Son Of Naresh Saxena, Employee C/o Tata Motor Finance Limited, Kota. 3. Nitesh Kumar Son Of Unknown, Employee C/o Tata Motor Finance Limited, Kota. 4. Harish Gautam Son Of Devki Nandan, Employee C/o Tata Motor Finance Limited, Kota. 5. Jai Kashyap Son Of Vijay Singh Kashyap, Employee C/o Tata Motor Finance Limited, Kota. 6. Jugraj Bairwa Son Of Modu Lal, Employee C/o Tata Motor Finance Limited, Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mayank Kumar Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 27/11/2025 1. For a limited prayer, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, seeking directions to the learned Sessions Judge, Jhalawar to decide the transfer application submitted by him. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that seeking transfer of the criminal case No. 367/2015 pending before the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chumela, an application was submitted by the petitioner on 19.04.2025 before (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7022/2025] the learned Sessions Judge, Jhalawar. However, in spite of passing more than six months, till date the same has not been decided. Hence, under these circumstances, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking issuance of directions to the learned Sessions Judge to decide the said application within a fixed time frame. 3. Considering the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the transfer application is pending before the learned Sessions Judge since 19.04.2025, it is expected from the learned Sessions Judge to make all possible endeavours to decide the pending application, after providing appropriate opportunity of hearing to the both sides, expeditiously as early as possible, preferably on the next date and if not possible then by fixing a short date. 4. Accordingly, the criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/47