Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48052 (PAT)

Amrik Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./35712/2025 · 2025-06-17

Chandra Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35712 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2025 Thana- UPHARA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Amrik Kumar S/O Sidhnath Mahto R/O Village- Budhai Kurd, P.S- Upahara, Distt.- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Bihar 2. Jhunni Kumari D/O Sujit Mahto R/O Village- Dhudhai Khurd, P.S- Uphara, Distt.- Aurangabad. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Malti Kumari For the Informant : Mr. Umakant Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 17-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with POCSO G.R. No. 40 of 2025 arising out of Uphara P.S. Case No. 47 of 2025 dated 05.04.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 329(3), 351(2), 74, 75(2), 76 of the BNS and 8/12 of the POCSO Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have entered the house of the informant and molested her. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that it is a case of molestation. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35712 of 2025(2) dt.17-06-2025 2/2 The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 06.04.2025. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner by submitting that the victim is a minor girl. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above- named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Aurangabad in connection with POCSO G.R. No. 40 of 2025 arising out of Uphara P.S. Case No. 47 of 2025. 7. The application stands allowed. guddukr/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T