Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4805 (GAU)

M/s Sera Agency and Anr v. The State of AP and 7 Ors

WP(C)/439/2024 · 2025-09-07

Nelson Sailo

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040013172024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/439/2024 M/s Sera Agency and Anr a proprietorship concern having its registered office at Village Nyokum, PO and PS Itanagar, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh, represented by its sole proprietor Shri Dongche Peter 2: Dongche Peter Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Dongche Taning permanent resident of Nyokum PO and PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 7 Ors represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Principal Secretary (PWD) Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:The Chief Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Central Zone A PWD Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh. 4:The Superintending Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Page No.# 2/3 Yachuli Civil Circle PWD Arunachal Pradesh. 5:The Executive Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Sangram Division PWD Sangram Arunachal Pradesh. 6:The Tender Evolution Board cum Tender Evaluation Authority Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its Chairman Sangram Division PWD Arunachal Pradesh. 7:The Additional Deputy Commissioner cum District Election Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Koloriang Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh. 8:M/s United Pisa Communication Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its proprietor Shri Pisa Pama Son of Late Pisa Chapo permanent resident of Village Sate PO Sarli PS Koloriang Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Teto Taba, Nimcha Hondique,Vijay Duku Raji,C Ering,Begi Taba Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO ORDER Date : 08.09.2025 Ms. N. Hondique, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that she has instructions to withdraw the writ petition. Mr. Y. Riram, learned Government Advocate for the State is present. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. JUDGE Comparing Assistant