APHC010177282020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 11287/2020 Between: 1. GONDU JAGANNADHA RAO, S/O. LATE GANGULU, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. SINGUPURAM VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM RURAL, SRIKAKULAM MANDAL AND DISTRICT. 2. POTUNURU KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O SINGUPURAM VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM RURAL, SRIKAKULAM MANDAL AND DISTRICT. 3. POTUNURU BHASKAR RAO,, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O KISTATAPPA PETA VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM RURAL, SRIKAKULAM MANDAL AND DISTRICT. 4. POTUNURU SEETHAM RAJU, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O KISTATAPPA PETA VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM RURAL, SRIKAKULAM MANDAL AND DISTRICT. 5. POTUNURU SAMPATHA RAO, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,KISTATAPPA PETA VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM RURAL, SRIKAKULAM MANDAL AND DISTRICT. 6. POTUNURU VENKATA RAO, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O KISTATAPPA PETA VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM RURAL, SRIKAKULAM MANDAL AND DISTRICT. 2 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM MANDAL AND DISTRICT, A.P. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER RDO, SRIKAKULAM MANDAL AND DISTRICT, A.P. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, SINGUPURAM VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM MANDAL AND DISTRICT, A.P. 5. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, SINGUPURAM VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM MANDAL AND DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 Order: No representation for the petitioners. Heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondent No.3 in coming on to the land of the petitioners situated in Sy.No.446/1A1/1 to an extent of Ac.2.29 cents on 28.06.2020 and threatening the petitioners and dispossessing them without there being any notice or land acquisition proceedings etc for giving house sites to the houseless poor under Navaratnalu– Pedalandariki Illu Scheme, without following due process of law. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that in view of the interim order in this case, the respondent authorities concerned will follow the due procedure with respect to the subject land. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos.2 to 5 are directed to deal with the subject land to an extent of Ac.2.29 cents in Sy.No.446/1A1/1 situated in Singupuram Village, Srikakulam Mandal and District, strictly in accordance with law and if so warranted for any public purpose. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 23.09.2025 PNS 4