KAVITA D/O. KALAVEERAPPA UPPANASI W/O. RAJENDRA BASHETTIYAVAR v. KALAVEERAPPA V UPPANASI
RPFC/100132/2022 · 2025-03-18
E S Indiresh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48038 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48038 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:4976 RPFC No. 100132 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 100132 OF 2022 (-)
BETWEEN:
KAVITA W/O. RAJENDRA BASHETTIYAVAR, AGED 31 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. KURUBAGONDA, HAVERI, TQ: AND DIST: HAVERI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. G.I. GACHCHINAMATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
KALAVEERAPPA V. UPPANASI, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, OCC: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT WORK, SENIOR POSTMAN, R/O. MRUTUNJAYA NAGAR, POST OFFICE, DHARWAD-580006, NOW RESIDENT OF SHIVAGANGA NAGAR, KAMTI PLOT, SAUNDATTI ROAD, DHARWAD, DIST: DHARWAD. …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT SERVED, UNREPRESENTED)
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 06.03.2021 MADE IN CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS NO.05/2020 PASSED BY THE FAMILY COURT, HAVERI SO FAR IT PERTAINS TO THE PETITIONER (RESPONDENT NO.2 IN CRL. MISC NO.5/2020) AND FURTHER DISMISS THE CRL. MISC. NO.05/2020 AND ETC.
MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:4976 RPFC No. 100132 of 2022
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Heard the
learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
2. This petition is filed by the respondent No.2 in Criminal Miscellaneous No.5/2020, challenging the order dated 06.03.2021 on the file of Family Court, Haveri (for short, hereinafter referred to as ‘Family Court’), cancelling the maintenance to be payable to respondent No.2 (petitioner herein).
3. Having taken note of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner herein, as the petitioner herein is married and therefore, the Family Court rightly cancelled the maintenance to be payable to the petitioner herein and therefore, no interference is called for in this petition.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:4976 RPFC No. 100132 of 2022
4. Accordingly, petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SMM CT-MCK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1