[2025:RJ-JP:43599] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16407/2025 All India Fair Price Shop Dealers Federation, Rajasthan, Tehsil Unit Chomu Through Its Tehsil President Mukesh Kumar Sharma S/o Prabhu Dayal Sharma, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village And Post Barwada, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Food And Civil Supply Department, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Food Commissioner, Food And Civil Supply Department, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The District Collector (Supply), Collectorate, Banipark, Jaipur. 4. The District Supply Officer-I, District Supply Office, Collectorate, Banipark, Jaipur. 5. The District Supply Officer-II, District Supply Office, Collectorate, Banipark, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Subhash Sharma, Adv. with Ms. Swati Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prashant Vijay, Adv. for Mr. Lokendra Singh Rao, Dy.G.C HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 30/10/2025 1. This petition has been filed with the following prayer: "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that your lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and by an appropriate writ of mandamus, order or direction in natute thereof: 1) The impugned advertisement no. 640 dated 04.09.2025 and 987 dated 04.09.2025 issued by the respondent no. 3 may kindly be quashed and set aside with further direction to the respondents to issue fresh advertisement for the allotment of fair price shop in legislative area of District [2025:RJ-JP:43599] (2 of 2) [CW-16407/2025] Jaipur as per guideline and criteria issued by the respondents vide letter dated 27.03.2023, 22.10.2019 and 26.12.2019 respectively. 2) Any other order which the Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case also be passed in favour of humble petitioner along with cost of writ petition." 2. Mr. Prashant Vijay, Adv. appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.5. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the advertisement Nos. 640 and 987 dated 04.09.2025 annexed as Annexure-4 and Annexure-5 respectively, issued by District Collector (Supply), Jaipur against the settled guidelines issued in this regard. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has submitted a representation but the same has not been decided yet by the respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the petition be disposed of at this stage while directing respondents to decide the representation dated 10.09.2025 within a period of 15 days from the receipt of the certified copy of this order. 5. Heard and perused the material available on record. 6. In that view of the matter, the petition is disposed of at this stage with the direction to the respondent to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner within a period of 15 days from the receipt of certified copy of this order. 7. With the above direction, the petition is disposed of. 8. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J TANISHA /74