IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. 131 CWP-11119-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.04.2025. ANIL KUMAR ... Petitioner(s) Versus DISTRICT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SOCIETY, NUH AND ANOTHER …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. PRESENT: Mr. R.K. Malik, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Kartikey Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, DAG, Haryana. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J (ORAL) The present petition had been filed for seeking quashing of the Noting dated 18.04.2025 (Annexure P-4) proposing to terminate the services of the petitioner till the clarification is received from the Chief Secretary, Human Resources Department, Haryana. A further prayer has been made to quash the order dated 13.06.2024 (Annexure P-6) whereby the period from 25.01.2018 to 18.12.2023 has not been considered as a duty period and also to release the salary for the period w.e.f. November 2024 till date with all arrears. 2 I am afraid that a writ petition against an office Noting in the absence of any final decision having been taken would not be maintainable. The instant writ petition is thus pre-mature and is dismissed accordingly. RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.04.25 15:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-11119-2025 (O&M) -2- 3 So far as the remaining contention of the petitioner as regards the non-payment of the salary and non-inclusion of the period as a duty period is concerned, liberty is granted to the petitioner to submit a representation to the competent authority which such authority would thereafter take a decision on the same in a time bound manner and preferably within a period of four months of submission of such a representation. April 24, 2025. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) raj arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.04.25 15:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document