Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48030 (PNJ)

SURAJ MANI v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/21165/2025 · 2025-07-28

Rajesh Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 215 SURAJ MANI STATE OF CORAM: Present: RAJESH BHARDWAJ 1. the petitioner in a case FIR No. Sections 115(2), 126(2), 333 of BNS, 2023 (Section 304(2) of BNS, 2023 added lateron) 2. protection, the petitioner was directed to join the investigation. 3. petitioner has joined the investigation and fully cooperated with and thus, the interim order may kindly be made absolute. 4. Singh, has affirmed the fact that the petitioner has joined the investigation and he is no more required for further investigatio 5. order dated as envisaged under Section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha 2023. July 28, 2025 Mohit Bishnoi Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SURAJ MANI Versus p STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MR. J1USTICE Mr. Anupam Bhanot, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Simran Goria, AAG, Punjab. ***** RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) Prayer in the present petition is for the petitioner in a case FIR No.48 dated 115(2), 126(2), 333 of BNS, 2023 (Section 304(2) of BNS, 2023 added lateron) at Police Station Phillaur, District Jalandhar By virtue of order dated 24.04 protection, the petitioner was directed to join the investigation. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation and fully cooperated with and thus, the interim order may kindly be made absolute. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI has affirmed the fact that the petitioner has joined the investigation no more required for further investigatio In view of the above, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 24.04.2025 is made absolute subject to compliance of as envisaged under Section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha 28, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH CRM-M-21165-2025 Date of Decision: 28.07.2025 ...Petitioner Versus ...Respondent USTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ , Advocate for the petitioner. Goria, AAG, Punjab. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to dated 02.03.2025, registered under 115(2), 126(2), 333 of BNS, 2023 (Section 304(2) of BNS, 2023 Phillaur, District Jalandhar. 24.04.2025, while granting interim protection, the petitioner was directed to join the investigation. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation and fully cooperated with the same and thus, the interim order may kindly be made absolute. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Sukhdev has affirmed the fact that the petitioner has joined the investigation no more required for further investigation. In view of the above, the present petition is allowed and the is made absolute subject to compliance of conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, (RAJESH BHARDWAJ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 28.07.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondent grant of anticipatory bail to , registered under 115(2), 126(2), 333 of BNS, 2023 (Section 304(2) of BNS, 2023 , while granting interim Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the the same Sukhdev has affirmed the fact that the petitioner has joined the investigation In view of the above, the present petition is allowed and the conditions Sanhita, MOHIT 2025.07.29 07:00