[2025:RJ-JP:43838] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3889/2021 1. Babita Devi W/o Omprakash, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Village Mukal, Tehsil And Police Station Malakheda, District Alwar. 2. Omprakash S/o Shri Madan Lal, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Village Mukal, Tehsil And Police Station Malakheda, District Alwar. 3. Tarachand S/o Shri Madanlal, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Village Mukal, Tehsil And Police Station Malakheda, District Alwar. 4. Shanti Devi W/o Shri Madan Lal, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of Village Mukal, Tehsil And Police Station Malakheda, District Alwar. 5. Meera W/o Tarachand, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Village Mukal, Tehsil And Police Station Malakheda, District Alwar. 6. Mukesh S/o Shri Bhairolal, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Village Mukal, Tehsil And Police Station Malakheda, District Alwar. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Superintendent Of Police, District Alwar (Raj.). 4. The Station House Officer, Police Station Malakheda, District Alwar. 5. Babulal Meena S/o Tunda Ram Meena, R/o Hasan Khan Mewat Nagar, D-1, Alwar. 6. Yogesh Gurjar S/o Shri Unknown, R/o Udhanwas, Hasan Khan Mewat Nagar, Alwar. 7. Bijendra @ Vijay Meena S/o Unknown, R/o Kati Ghati Meena Hotel, District Alwar. 8. Raghuveer S/o Kanhaiya, R/o Kirwada, Tehsil Todabheem, District Karauli (Raj.). 9. Mona W/o Prem Narayan, R/o Sukal, Tehsil And District Alwar. [2025:RJ-JP:43838] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3889/2021] 10. Blajeet S/o Prem Narayan, R/o Sukal, Tehsil And District Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajpal Yogi, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Ashish Sharma, Adv. & Mr. Anutosh Mishra, Adv. for Mr. Ashvin Garg, Adv. Mr.Vishnu Kumar Sharma, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 01/11/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the instant Criminal Miscellaneous Petition on account of there being compromise between the parties. 2. Accordingly, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /31