Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48022 (AP)

Madala Siva Ramakrishna, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/16343/2021 · 2025-09-22

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010279032021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16343/2021 Between: 1. MADALA SIVA RAMAKRISHNA,, S/O (LATE) RAJENDRA PRASAD, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O NEERUKONDA VILLAGE, H/O KORIGALLU, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 3. THE S H O, MANGALAGIRI RURAL POLICE STATION, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. VENU PRASAD, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WRITER AT 3RD RESPONDENT, MANGALAGIRI RURAL POLICE STATION, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the Respondents 1 to 3 on Petitioner's complaint dt.25-07-2021 as illegal, unethical, arbitrary, unconstitutional and against the fundamental rights guaranteed under the 2 Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 1 to 3 to take necessary action on Petitioner's complaint dt.25-07-2021 and protect the Petitioner from high-handed, illegal acts of the 4th Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G RAMACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16343 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 on Petitioner's complaint dt.25-07-2021 as illegal, unethical, arbitrary, unconstitutional and against the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to take necessary action on Petitioner's complaint dt.25-07-2021 and protect the Petitioner from high-handed, illegal acts of the 4th Respondent.…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 23.09.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.16343 of 2021 Dated.23.09.2025 UPS 78