[2025:RJ-JP:46252] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17650/2025 Ved Prakash Yadav S/o Hari Singh Yadav, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Vpo Shri Krishna Nagar, Teshil Mundawar, District - Khairthal Tijara, Rajasthan (Roll No. 4113038) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Primary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The District Education Officer (Elementary Education), Headquarter, Jhalawar. 4. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jhalawar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 17/11/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring order dated 28.08.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12876/2025 submitted that similar controversy was considered by this Hon’ble Court in case of Kindar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6507/2017) decided on 04.08.2021 and case of present petitioner is squarely covered from order as referred by him. 2. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the [2025:RJ-JP:46252] (2 of 2) [CW-17650/2025] petitioner to make a representation to the respondents in light of order dated 04.08.2021 passed by this Court in case of Kindar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (supra). In case, respondents finds that the case of present petitioner is covered by referred circular dated 18.05.2020 and order dated 04.08.2021 passed by this Court then appropriate order for modification of his place of posting may be passed within a period of four weeks from date of submission of representation along with copy of this order. In case of any deviation, a reasoned and speaking order be passed within said period and a copy be supplied to petitioner by speed post or E-mail. 3. It is hereby clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case in favour of petitioner. 4. Accordingly, writ petition along with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /37