APHC010054142003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 13638/2003 Between: 1. S. NARASIMHA NAIDU VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, S/O. SATYAM NAIDU, SECRETARY, POTTIDORAPALEM PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY, BUTCHAIAHPET MANDAL, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF A P COOP DEPT BY ITS SECRETARY HYD, COOPERATION DEPT., REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER REGISTRAR OF, COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD. 3. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK, LIMITED, REP.BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. THE DIVISIONAL COOPERATIVE OFFICER, YELAMANCHILI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. POTTIDORAPALEM PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY, REP.BY ITS PERSON IN-CHARGE COMMITTEE. POTTIDORAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings dated 9-8-2002, issued by the 6th Respondent terminating the Services of the Petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice including contrary to Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and set aside the same, consequently direct the respondents to re-instate the petitioner with all benefits and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 16912 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings dated 9-8-2002 issued by the 6th Respondent, pending disposal of the W.P., and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B SOMASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M S RAMCHANDRA RAO 2. DADI RADHA KRISHNA 3. ELEVATED AS JUDGE 4. GP FOR COOPERATION 3 The Court made the following order: Sri B.Somasekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ____ Date: 25.09.2025. MP 4 202 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION No.13638 of 2003 Date: 25.09.2025 MP