KASTURI DHANALAKSHMI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/4663/2023 · 2025-05-05
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48008 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48008 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
4N THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE 4 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4663 OF 2023 Between: KASTURI DHANALAKSHMI, W/o Neelakanti Venkateswara Rao, Hindu aged 41 years, R/o. Flat No.S-5, III Floor, Srinivas Towers, Krishnalanka Vijayawada ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh, High Court Buildings at Nelapadu, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh (SHO, Krishnalanka P.S.Vijayawada)
2. D.Sambasiva Rao, S/o late Madhava Rao, Hindu, Aged 47 years, R/o Sanath Nagar, Khabaristan Road, Kanuru, Vijayawada. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying that, in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the entire records relating to and in connection with Crl.M.P.No.48 of 2019 in C.C.No. 180 of 2017 on the file of II Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Vijayawada to quash the same.
i M ■M w?
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying that, in the circffmetances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition 1 Court may be pleased to Stay of the all the further proceedings in 9.C.N0. 180/2017 on the file of II Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Court Vijayawada, NTR District. > This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Etukuri Madhu Murthy, Advocate for the Petitioner, the Public Prosecutor of High Court of Andhra Pradesh on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of M/s Chalasani Ajay Kumar, Advocate for the Respondent N0.2. The Court made the following:
APHC010324222023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4663/2023 Between: ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED Kasturi Dhanalakshmi AND ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1.ETUKURI MADHU MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2.CHALASANI AJAY KUMAR The Court made the following;
isiii 2 ■ HtlJ CRLP.'N0.4663 OF2C23 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4663/209.-^
ORDER:- The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed in Crl.l\/I.P.No.48 of 2019 in C.C.No.180 of 2017. The petitioner had filed CrI send Exhibit PI and P2, ■M.P seeking to promissory note and cheque to the Regional Forensic Laboratory for expert opinion with regard to difference of I I / / signatures in vakalath and Exhibit PI and P2.
2. Learned Magistrate has considered their dismissed the same. The PW-1 in cross-examination has stated that the promissory note and cheque were not given at the also observed by the learned Magistrate, that the year 2017 and the petition was filed at a belated stage only. petition on merits and i same time, that it was complaint was of the i
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits coming up for arguments. However, this Court finds that the matter is I no grounds to | interfere in well considered order and admittedly the criminal case in I C.C.No.180 of 2017 has been pending for the last eight (08) years. The petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed on 29.03.2023, and there i no explanation as to why the petition was filed on 07.07.2023, that apart this Court, also considered view that the petition filed by the petitioner i: only to drag on the matter, without further IS IS i proceeding in th^^aj Court, i
\ \ 3 S HN, CRLP.N0.4663 OF2023 Considering the stage of the case, and also the matter is coming up for
arguments, this Court is not inclined to interfere. 1
4. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ //TRUE GOPY/Z SECTION OFFICER To
1. The II Additional Metropolitan Magistrate NTR District.
2. One CC to Sri Etukuri Madhu Murthy, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to M/s Chalasani Ajay Kumar, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CC’s to The Public Prosecutor of High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
5. Three CD Copies Court, Vijayawada, GPC nm
\ HIGH COURT DATED: 06/05/2025 P I ^ •% I I11 AUG 2I»5 S ^ * Current Section , ^
ORDER CRLP.No.4663 of 2023 dismissing this CRLP