Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48007 (PNJ)

PRITPAL v. RAM PIARI AND OTHERS

CR/2447/2025 · 2025-04-24

Nidhi Gupta

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 140 Pritpal Ram Piari and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Constitution of India is for quashing of impugned order dated 20.03.2025 (Annexure P 47 of 2016 titled as ‘ have been issued to initiate proc to interfere in the matter may be permitted to withdraw the instant the petitioner to concerned. 24.04.2025 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-2447 Date of Decision: Versus Ram Piari and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. R.Kartikeya, Advocate for the petitioner. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for quashing of impugned order dated 20.03.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by the learned Executing 47 of 2016 titled as ‘Ram Piari vs. Mohinder Singh have been issued to initiate proceedings against the petitioner. After arguing for some time when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the may be permitted to withdraw the instant revision petition, with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the pleas before the Deputy Commissioner, concerned. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2447-2025 Date of Decision: 24.04.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA R.Kartikeya, Advocate for the petitioner. Prayer in this revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for quashing of impugned order dated 20.03.2025 1) passed by the learned Executing Court in Execution No. Mohinder Singh’, whereby directions eedings against the petitioner. when this Court is not inclined learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he revision petition, with liberty to raise all the pleas before the Deputy Commissioner, with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No Prayer in this revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for quashing of impugned order dated 20.03.2025 Court in Execution No. ’, whereby directions when this Court is not inclined submits that he revision petition, with liberty to raise all the pleas before the Deputy Commissioner, RISHU KATARIA 2025.04.25 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.