APHC010128432013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 748/2013 Between: 1. RAYUDU SURYA KUMARI & 3 OTHERS, W/O LATE APPA RAO OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O D. NO 16-33-12/2, 1ST STREET, SAMBAMURHTY NAGAR, KAKINADA EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 2. RAYUDU SURESH KUMAR, S/O LATE APPA RAO, OCC: MECHANIC R/O D. NO 16-33-12/2, 1ST STREET, SAMBAMURHTY NAGAR, KAKINADA EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3. KOPPISETTI SUDHA SRAVANTHI, W/O K RAMA KRISHNAN OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O D. NO 16-33-12/2, 1ST STREET, SAMBAMURHTY NAGAR, KAKINADA EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 4. RAYUDU TABITA ROJA, D/O LATE APPA RAO OCC: STUDENT R/O D. NO 16-33-12/2, 1ST STREET, SAMBAMURHTY NAGAR, KAKINADA EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. RAYUDU STAYANARAYANA 3 OTHERS, S/O LATE SUBBA RAO OCC: MECHANIC R/O D. NO 16-33-12/2, 1ST STREET, SAMBAMURHTY NAGAR, KAKINADA EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 2. RAYUDU PUSHPA KUMARI, W/O LATE PRAKASARAO OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O D. NO 16-33-12/2, 1ST STREET, SAMBAMURHTY NAGAR, KAKINADA EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3. RAYUDU LAKSHMI PRASANNA, D/O LATE PRAKASARAO OCC: STUDENT R/O D. NO 16-33-12/2, 1ST STREET, 2 SAMBAMURHTY NAGAR, KAKINADA EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 4. RAYUDU SAI TEJA, S/O LATE PRAKASARAO AGEW 19 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT R/O D. NO 16-33-12/2, 1ST STREET, SAMBAMURHTY NAGAR, KAKINADA EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against ordersagainst the Judgement d.t03.07.2013 passed in I.A.NO.53 of 2013 in O.S.NO.402 of 2011, on the file of I Addl Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CMAMP 1623 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings in O.S.No.402 of 2011, on the file of I Addl Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, pending disposal of above CMA and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. VENKATESWARLU RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO The Court made the following: 3 JUDGMENT: Despite the matter being listed today i.e., on 25.09.2025 under the caption ‘for Dismissal’, there is no representation for the appellants. Even on the earlier occasions, i.e., on 04.09.2025, 21.08.2025, 24.07.2025 and 21.06.2024, there was no representation for the appellants. 2. Therefore, it appears that the appellants have no interest to prosecute the case. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 25th September, 2025 cbn 4 237 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CMA No.748 of 2013 25th September, 2025 cbn