Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47992 (KAR)

SABHINABANU ALIAS SABBENBANU W/O MUDASSARNAZAR BADEGHAR v. MUDASSARNAZAR S/O NABISAB BADEGHAR

RPFC/100166/2024 · 2025-01-15

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH RPFC NO.100166 OF 2024 BETWEEN SABHINABANU ALIAS SABBENBANU W/O MUDASSARNAZAR BADEGHAR AGE. 32 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O.C/O. MUNJULA KUSHTAGI ROHIT APARTMENT 4TH LEFT CROSS PANCHAKSARI COLONY BENGERI HUBBALLI AND ANOTHER. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. MALLIKARJUN S. HALEMANI AND M.V. MUCHANDI, ADVOCATE) AND MUDASSARNAZAR S/O NABISAB BADEGHAR AGE. 38 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESSMEN R/O.NEAR DHANVANTRI HOSPITAL MUSTAFA COLONY, VIJAYAPUR (BIJAPUR) …RESPONDENT RPFC FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, 1984, PRAYING THAT THE ORDER DATED 04.01.2024 PASSED IN CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO.308/2021 BY THE 2 PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, HUBBALLI, MAY KINDLY BE SET ASIDE AND THEREBY ENHANCE THE QUANTUM OF MAINTENANCE FROM RS.12,000/- TO RS. 1,50,000 TO THE REVISION PETITIONER NO.1 AND FROM RS.6,000/- TO RS.50,000/- TO REVISION PETITIONER NO.2. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING; O R D E R Finally, two weeks time is granted to remove the office objections, failing which the petition shall be dismissed without reference to the Bench. Sd/- JUDGE Note As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 25.02.2025, the Advocate for the Appellant has not complied office objection. Hence, this above matter stands dismissed without reference to the Bench as per the court order dated:15.01.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T- By: cmu C- By: sgs