Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:42149] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12435/2025 Salim S/o Sohrab Khan, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Domraki, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg. (Presently Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ---Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Liyakat Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Order 15/10/2025 The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity “the BNSS”). The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.148/2025 registered at Police Station Sikari, District Deeg for the offence under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 303(2), 111(2)(a), 308(2), 313 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity “the BNS, 2023”) and Sections 66D, 67 and 67a of Information Technology (Amended) Act, 2008 (for short, ‘IT Act, 2008) and later on for the offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 303(2), 111(2), 308, 313 and 61(2) of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 66D, 67 and 67a of IT Act, 2008.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that he is in custody since 11.09.2025, investigation as against him is
[2025:RJ-JP:42149] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12435/2025] complete, he has no criminal antecedents of similar nature, similarly situated co-accused persons have already been extended benefit of bail by this Court and prays for his release on bail. Though, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer; but, could not dispute that similarly situated co-accused persons have already been extended benefit of bail by this Court. Heard. Considered. Taking into consideration the contentions advanced by
learned counsel for the petitioner, nature of accusation, material available in the case diary, his length of custody, absence of criminal antecedents of similar nature and release of similarly situated co-accused persons on bail; but, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Salim S/o Sohrab Khan shall be released on bail under Section 483 BNSS in connection with aforementioned FIR registered at concerned Police Station, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of ₹1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of ₹50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation that he shall comply with all the conditions laid down under Section 480(3) BNSS.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /153