1 2025:CGHC:54194 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1679 of 2023 Anil Shrivastav S/o Dinesh Prashad Shrivastav, Aged About 54 Years Posted As Vyayam Shikshak (L.B.) At Government Higher Secondary School Patthalgoan, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - District Education Officer Jashpur, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Jashpur, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Patthalgaon, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh. 5 - Block Education Officer, Patthalgaon, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None For State : Mr. Devesh G. Kela, Panel Lawyer YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.11.06 19:30:21 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 06.11.2025 1. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition even in two rounds. 2. Mr. Devesh G. Kela, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State, is present. 3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition with the following prayers:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to release the arrears Rs. 4,67,267/- of salary from September 2005 to August-2012 on completion of 7 years of time bound pay scale to the petitioner with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of entitlement to its actual payment, in accordance with law. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deems fit and appropriate.” 4. Today, when the case is called, learned counsel for the petitioner is not present nor any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition on repeated calls and it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter, as such this Court has left with no other option, but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 3 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh