CHENNU BALAKRISHNA REDDY, SPSR NELLORE DIST & 2 OTHERS v. PRL SECY, MUNICIPAL ADMN & URBAN DEVT DEPT, HYDERABAD & 3 OT
WP/7954/2015 · 2025-09-11
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47986 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47986 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010818132015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 7954/2015 Between:
1. CHENNU BALAKRISHNA REDDY, SPSR NELLORE DIST & 2 OTHERS, S/O RAMACHANDRA REDDY, AGED 63 YEARS,
2. CHENNU ADINARAYANA REDDY,, S/O RAMACHANDRA REDDY, AGED 65 YEARS,
3. CHENNU TRIPAL REDDY,, S/O VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, AGED 41 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF 23/1050, ARAVIND NAGAR, NEAR RTC BUS STAND, NELLORE CITY AND SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. PRL SECY MUNICIPAL ADMN URBAN DEVT DEPT HYDERABAD 3 OT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.
2. THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NELLORE, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, NELLORE CITY AND SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT AT NELLORE.
4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT AT NELLORE CITY
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. KARRI MURALI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
3. ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO
4. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:-
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that, though the respondent authorities proposed to take up the construction on GNT road and to mark certain portions of the petitioner’s property. Subsequently, that plan was shelved and the survey report was discarded.
2. It is also stated in the written instructions that any further proposed road-widening activity would be in accordance with the procedure of law.
3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 12.09.2025 SR