Noorudeen @ Rafi @ Ismail @ Nayeem @ Sheik Maideen v. The Union of India Rep.by its, The Deputy Superintendent of Police /
CRL A/375/2025 · 2025-09-25
J Nisha Banu, S Sounthar
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47981 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47981 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.A.No.375 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25.09.2025 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR Crl.A.No.375 of 2025 Noorudeen @ Rafi @ Ismail @ Nayeem @ Sheik Maideen ... Appellant/Accused -vs- The Union of India, Rep. by its The Deputy Superintendent of Police / National Investigation Agency, Chennai. ... Respondent/Complainant Prayer: Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 21 of NIA Act to set aside the judgment and order in Cr.M.P.No.155 of 2025 dated 21.03.2025 in Spl.S.C.No.15 of 2022 on the file of Special Court under the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (Sessions Court for Exclusive Trial for Bomb Blast and POTA Cases) Chennai at Poonamallee, Chennai-56 and enlarge the petitioner on bail. For Appellant : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu For Respondent : Mr.R.Karthikeyan
Spl. Public Prosecutor ***** J U D G M E N T (By J.Nisha Banu,J.) Challenging the dismissal of the bail petition by the Special Court under the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (Sessions Court for Exclusive Trial for Bomb Blast and POTA Cases) Chennai at Poonamallee, the appellant is 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.375 of 2025 before this Court.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent that the appellant was an Under-Trial Prisoner and faced trial in Spl.S.C.No.15 of 2022. After a full- fledged trial, the appellant has been convicted on 13.08.2025 and therefore, the question of consideration of bail to the appellant does not arise. It was prayed that the present appeal may be dismissed as infructuous. The said submission has not been refuted by the learned counsel for the appellant.
3. In view of the above submissions, we are of the view that nothing survives for further adjudication in this appeal. Accordingly, the instant Criminal Appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
(J.N.B.J.,) (S.S,J.,) 25.09.2025 Index: Yes / No Internet: Yes / No ar 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.375 of 2025 To:
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police / National Investigation Agency, The Union of India, Chennai.
2. The Special Public Prosecutor for NIA cases, High Court, Madras.
J.NISHA BANU, J. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.375 of 2025 AND S.SOUNTHAR, J. ar Crl.A.No.375 of 2025 25.09.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis