Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47981 (AP)

MALLAVARAPU RANI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/26236/2025 · 2025-09-25

R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010510292025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 26236/2025 Between: 1. MALLAVARAPU RANI, W/O PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O D.NO.4-67, SC COLONY, ANNAVARAM VILLAGE AND POST, SANKHAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, NOW KAKINADA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, VEIAGAPUDI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA DISTRICT, KAKINADA. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ANNAVARAM POLICE STATION, ANNAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, NOW KAKINADA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased to issue an order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the Respondent 2 to 4 to produce the detainee i.e., Mallavarapu Prasad, S/o Lazaru, aged about 48 years, R/o Annavaram Village and Post, Sankhavaram Mandal, East Godavari District, Now Kakinada District, from the illegal custody of 4 Respondent, before the Hon'ble Court and consequently direct the Respondents Nos.1 to 3 to initiate action against 4th Respondent, for the illegal detention of the petitioner's husband and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL 2. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL 3 The Court made the following ORDER: (per Hon’ble Justice Sri R.Raghunandana Rao) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would avail alternative remedy. In such circumstances, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 26.09.2025 KA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 26236/2025 Date: 26.09.2025 KA