- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5361 WP No. 107630 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 107630 OF 2023 (S-R) BETWEEN: SRI. SHEKHAPPA FAKKIRAPPA ILIGER, AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE, R/O: H.NO.9, SOUJANNYA, ASHWAMEDHA PARK, BEHIND HP PETROL PUMP, AMRGOL, NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI, DIST: DHARWAD. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUNIL.S.DESAI., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU -01. 2. THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, 9TH FLOOR, DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, SRI. M.VISHWESHWARAIAH TOWER, BENGALURU-560 001. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HAVERI, DIST: HAVERI. 4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR DISTRICT, URBAN CELL OFFICE OF Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5361 WP No. 107630 of 2023 5. THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF PENSION SMALL SAVINGS AND ASSETS AND LIABILITIES, BANGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented, either personally or through video conferencing. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed before Addl. Registrar (Judicial) and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the petition was listed before the Court on 12.03.2025, on that day, finally a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the petition under the caption ‘for dismissal of petition for non- compliance of office objections’ on 24.03.2025. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5361 WP No. 107630 of 2023 The petition is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of petition for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the petitioner has not complied with the office objections. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. In view of peremptory order dated 12.03.2025, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections and also for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE CLK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39