Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47966 (RAJ)

ASHOK KUMAR TANDON S/O LATE SH. MOOL RAJ TANDON v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/12923/2024 · 2025-11-20

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47148] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12923/2024 Ashok Kumar Tandon S/o Late Sh. Mool Raj Tandon, Aged About 75 Years, R/o F-158, Near Bansal Hospital Janpath, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Commissioner, Department Of Commercial Taxes, Kar Bhawan, Jaipur. 3. Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akhil Simlote Mr. Ashvin Raj Tanwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rahul Lodha, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 20/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred with following prayer:- i) Call for the entire record of the case and examine the same; ii) By an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, thereby directed the respondents to sanction the benefit of 2nd ACP w.e.f. 01.01.2006 to the petitioner and revise the pay accordingly. iii) By an appropriate writ, or and direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents may kindly be directed to revise the pensionary benefit of petitioner accordingly; [2025:RJ-JP:47148] (2 of 2) [CW-12923/2024] iv) By an appropriate writ, or and direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents may kindly be directed to pay arrears thereof with interest @18% P.A. 2. Mr. Rahul Lodha, AGC accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.3. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner is directed to serve a copy of this order to learned counsel for respondents. 4. Office is directed to reflect the name of Mr. Rahul Lodha, AGC as counsel for respondents. 5. During course of arguments, it has been suggested that if petitioner moves a representation before the respondents- Authority then they will consider in accordance with prevalent rules and the procedure. 6. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of judgment referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /132