[2025:RJ-JP:45755-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1202/2025 1. The Chairman Cum Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Head Office Parivahan Marg, Jaipur. 2. The Executive Director (Transport), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Head Office, Jaipur. ----Appellants Versus Mukesh Chand Meena S/o Shri Parasram Meena, Aged About 40 Years, R/o 16-17 Anand Vihar, Block-B, Vatika, Sanganer, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Utkarsh Dubey, Adv. for Mr. Prateek Mathur, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 13/11/2025 1. This appeal assails the order dated 01.04.2025 passed by learned Single Judge in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4509/2025 as well as the order dated 17.02.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in Suryabhan Singh Shaktawat vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors., S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1329/2025. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the issue raised in the present appeal is no more res integra and the judgment passed by the Court in a bunch of special appeals in the case of Rajasthan State Road Transport & Ors. Vs Rajaram [2025:RJ-JP:45755-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-1202/2025] Jat: D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.501/2025, which reads as under:- “3.Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of appellants submits that the appellants have already framed the transfer policy with regard to transfer of their employees. Learned Senior Counsel further submits that in compliance of order dated 04.07.2025 passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the representation, if any, submitted by the respondents- employees have been considered and decided by them at this stage. 4.Learned counsel for the respondents have not disputed this fact however submits that liberty may be granted to them for filing the fresh writ petition if they feel aggrieved by the order passed on their representations. 5.Heard learned counsel for the parties. 6.Considering the submissions made by counsel for the parties, these appeals stand disposed of in view of the interim order dated 04.07.2025 passed by this Court. 7. Accordingly, the order passed by the learned Single Judge stands modified with liberty to respondents- employees to file fresh writ petition, if need so arises.” 3. Keeping in view the above, the present Special Appeal Writ stands disposed, mutatis mutandis. 4. All pending application(s) also stand disposed of. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ HEENA/188