Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47924 (KAR)

DURGANNA D TALAVAR S/O DURGAPPA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.RP/100049/2025 · 2025-04-22

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6722 CRL.RP No. 100049 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100049 OF 2025 (397(Cr.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: DURGANNA D. TALAVAR S/O. DURGAPPA, AGE: 18 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O: SIDDESHWAR ASHRAYA COLONY, UNKAL, HUBBALLI- 580031. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. R.M. JAVED, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH VIDYANAGAR P.S. REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENCH AT DHARWAD- 580001. 2. SMT. GIRIJA RENAKE W/O. KUMAR, AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE, R/O: SIDDESHWAR ASHRAYA COLONY, 3RD CROSS, UNKAL, HUBBALLI- 580031. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.P. KANDAGAL, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 102 OF JUVENILE JUSTICE ACT, 2015 SEEKING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 12.12.202, PASSED BY THE PRL. DIST AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DHARWAD IN CRL.A NO. 92/2024 AND ORDER DATED 20.09.2024 PASSED BY THE PRL. MAGISTRATE AND JUVENILE JUSTICE BOARD, DHARWAD IN VIDYANAGAR P.S. HUBLI CRIME NO. 107/2024 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/SEC. 137(2), 65(1) BNS AND SEC. 4(2), 6 OF POCSO ACT AND RELEASE THE REVISION PETITIONER/CICL ON BAIL BY ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION ON SUCH TERMS, AND CONDITIONS THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASE TO IMPOSE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. V N BADIGER Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.04.24 14:32:37 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6722 CRL.RP No. 100049 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) After addressing the arguments for sometime, Sri.R.M.Javeed, advocate files a memo. 2. Memo reads as under: “The Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not intending to prosecute the above matter as of now because, the respondent police have laid charge sheet and he intends to prefer on changed circumstances before the trial Court. Hence kindly permit him to withdraw the above matter in the interest of justice with a liberty to file fresh if need be, in the interest of justice.” 3. Placing the memo on record, revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6722 CRL.RP No. 100049 of 2025 4. Certified copies of the impugned orders shall be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner after keeping the photocopies of the same. SD/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE HMB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 21