Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47920 (ALL)

AMARJEET YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/12824/2025 · 2025-05-04

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:73230 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12824 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amarjeet Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Birendra Kumar Yadav,Lal Behari Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the Respondent No.2/ Additional Commissioner (Second), Varanasi Mandal, Varanasi to consider and decide the Appeal No. 231 of 2025 (Gaya and others Vs. Sukhram and others), under section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 and dispose of stay application filed by the petitioner against the impunged order dated 02.01.2025 passed by Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil-Saidpur, District-Ghazipur till then status quo may maintained by the parties." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that stay application in the above- mentioned case is pending consideration and the same has not been decided till date. Learned counsel prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. Since the stay application in the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the stay application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. 6. Till disposal of the stay application, parties are directed to maintain status quo. It is, however, provided that petitioner, who is the appellant before the Court below, will not seek adjournment and in case he sought an adjournment, the interim order granted by this Court, shall automatically vacated. Order Date :- 5.5.2025 Rishabh [Manish Kumar Nigam, J.] Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad