MAHABHALESHWAR S/O UDDANDA NAIK v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/101826/2024 · 2025-09-16
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47914 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47914 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12272 WP No. 101826 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 101826 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
MAHABHALESHWAR S/O UDDANDA NAIK, AGE 44 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O SHIRUR 581357, TQ. ANKOLA, DIST. UTTARA KANNADA, MOBILE-9008446332. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VADIRAJ P. VADAVI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU 560001, REPTD. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER UTTAR KANNADA.
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KUMATA SUB DIVISION, KUMUTA, DIST. UTTARA KANNADA.
4.
THE TAHSILDAR, ANKOLA.
DIST. UTTARA KANNADA. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A) KINDLY GRANT AD-
Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12272 WP No. 101826 of 2024
INTERIM ORDER AGAINST RESPONDENT NO.2 NOT TO ALLOT THE PLOT NO. 21 IN SURVEY NO. 169 A1 A1 B OF SHIRUR VILLAGE OF ANKOLA DIST. TO ANYBODY TILL DISPOSAL OF THIS PETITION. B) THE RESPONDENTS MAY KINDLY BE
DIRECTED TO TAKE NECESSARY ENTRIES OF THE PETITIONERS NAME IN THE REVENUE RECORDS AND ALSO ISSUE PATTA OF PLOT NO. 21, AND DECLARE THAT, THE PETITIONER IS THE ABSOLUTE OWNER OF THE PLOT 21, AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THERIEN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Despite the order dated 11.08.2025 office objections have not been complied with.
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
GAB