, ^ [3329 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 12008 OF 2025 THE Between: R/o. H.No. C.Narayanappa, S/o. Govindappa, Aged about 55 years Chelliganipalle Village, Rama Kuppam Mandal, Chittoor District ...PETITIONER 1-97 AND of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat Buildings,Velagapudi, Amaravathi, 1. The State Revenue Department Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Chittoor District. Divisional Officer, Ramakuppam, Chittoor District. Officer, Rama Kuppam Mandal, Chittoor District. 3. The Revenue 4. The Mandal Revenue ...RESPONDENTS Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying Petition under in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Writ of Mandamus, or any other that in Court may be pleased to issue a / appropriate writ, order direction, declaring the action of the Respondents in trying to demolish the cattle shed in Sy.No. 123/10 of Chelliganipalle Village, Ramakuppam Mandal, Chittoor District as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents not to demolish the cattle shed in Sy.No.123/10 of Chelliganipalle Village, Ramakuppam Mandal, Chittoor District without following due procedure. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to demolish the cattle shed in Sy.No. 123/10 of Chelliganipalle Village, Ramakuppam Mandal, Chittoor District without following due procedure. Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. K RAGHU VEER Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: / • • 1 • • • • X • • APHC010229502025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3329] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 12008/2025 Between: C.narayanappa ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KRAGHU VEER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GPFOR REVENUE This Court made the following ORDER:- 1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: "..to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order direction declaring the action of the Respondents in trying to demolish the cattle shed in Sy. No. 123/10 of Chelliganipalle Village 2 Ramakuppam Mandat. Chiitoor District as iiieaai ^J*itrary and vioiation of principies of naturai justfcl aemolish the cattle shed in Sv Nn DteMcrwUhM'ff ^^'-‘dat Chittoor pass ■■ foitowmg due procedure and to 2. During hearing, learned touching the merits of the direction to the respondents lands, without following due counsel for the petitioner, without case, requested this Court to issue a not to demolish the petitioner from their process of law. 3. Learned Assistant Government submitted that if the petitioner is i subject land and the process of law and accordance with law. 4. It is settled proposition of law Pleader for Respondents, - in continuous possession of respondents’ authorities would follow due requested to pass appropriate orders iin that when the petitioner is in settled possession and enjoyment of the property, the respondents' authorities are not entitled to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner and respondents would such highhanded action of the depriving the guaranteed under Article amount to petitioner’s constitutional right Constitution of India 300-A of the besides violation of Article 14 of the X V 3 Constitution of India. Even assuming for a moment that this petitioner’s possession is illegal, still, the petitioners are required to be afforded an opportunity before taking appropriate action and in view of the law declared by the Apex Court in (dead) by L.Rs. v. M.Varadappa Naidu (Dead) by L.Rs.\ when the petitioners are in settled possession and enjoyment of the they cannot be dispossessed, without following due of law. Therefore, the respondents are directed not to with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner’s subject property. However, if they intend to take any action against subject property of the petitioner, they shall follow the due-procedure as contemplated under the law. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No Rame Gowda property process interfere 5. costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications if any pending, shall stand closed. SRINIVASA REDDY deputy registrar SECTION OFFICER SD/-G //true COPY// of Andhra Guntur To District.[By Special Messenger] 1. The 2. The District Collector, Chittoor District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramakuppam, Chittoor District. 4. The Mandal Revenue Officer, District.[2 TO 4 BY RPAD] 5. One CC to SRI. K RAGHU VEER Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCS to GP FOR REVENUE .High Court of Andhra 7. Three CD Copies Rama Kuppam Mandal, Chittoor Pradesh. [OUT] Kt HIGH COURT DATED:06/05/2025 ORDER ^Of ANDfi^ WP.No.12008 of 2025 25 JUN 2025 O ^ . Current becnon DISPOSING OFF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS