M/S HHR Enterprise v. The State of AP and 4 Others
WP(C)/458/2023 · 2025-09-21
Kardak Ete
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4791 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4791 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040012872023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/458/2023 M/S HHR Enterprise represented and authorized signatory by Shri Takam Padu (Proprietor of M/S Takam Padu Construction.
VERSUS The State of AP and 4 Others represented by the secretary to the Government of Arunachal Pradesh, department of PWD, Civil Secretariat, Itanagar - 791111 2:The Commissioner PWD Age: 0 Occupation : Government of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar-791111 3:The Chief Engineer (PWD) Age: 0 Occupation : Central Zone- A Itanagar-791111 4:The Superintending Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : PWD Yachuli Civil circle Camp Naharlagun 5:The Executive Engineer (PWD) Age: 0 Occupation : Jamin Division Department of PWD Camp Plai
Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Petitioner : Gimi Tarak, T Sorang,L Asha,Byabang Ganga,Taja Garam Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP),
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 22-09-2025
Mr. G. Tarak, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to approach the appropriate forum in view of the fact that the claim of the petitioner is being highly disputed by the respondent authorities. Ms. R. Basar, learned Government Advocate for the respondents is present. Prayer for withdrawal is accepted. Accordingly, writ petition stands closed on withdrawal, with a liberty to approach the appropriate forum as may be permissible under the law.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant