. ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1452 nf 9nil Revision filed under Section 397 R/w 401 of Cr.P.C, aggrieved by the order of the Family Court, Visakhapatnam, in Crl.M.P.No.69 of 2010 in MC.No.472 of 2010, dated 29-04-2011. Between: T.V.K. Jagannadha Rao, S/o. Late T.V.K.Kannamnaidu, Hindu, aged about 60 years, Working as Chargeman, C/o. Loco Shed, T.No.118, Diesel Loco Shed, Diesel Mechanic Section, Khajipet, Warangal District. ...Petitioner/Respondent AND I^The State of A.P., Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A. P., at Amaravati. 2. Smt. Thota Anuradha, W/o, T.V.K. Jagannadha Rao 50 years, Housewife, R/o. D.No.7-265, Prasanthi Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam. Hindu, aged about Nagar, ...Respondents/Petitioners LA. NO: 1 OF 2011(CRLRCMP. NO: 2090 OF 2011) Petition under Section 482 circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i of Cr.P.C praying that in the in support of the petition, the High r> f\ \ % Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 29-04-2011 in MP.No.69 of 2010 in OP.No.472 of 2010 pending disposal of the main Revision. Counsel for the Petitioner : Smt S A V Ratnam Counsel for Respondent No.1; Public Prosecutor Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sri Ravi Teja, representing on behalf of Sri Y Sudhakar The Court made the following: X %»> APHC010112702011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] aSS FRIDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1452/2011 Between: ...PETITIONER T.v.k. Jagannadha Rao AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Ap Rep By Its Pp Hyd and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.S A V RATNAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.Y SUDHAKAR a^PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ■i ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. Mr. Ravi Teja, learned counsel, representing Sri Y.Sudhakar, the learned counsel for the respondent No.2, submits that the O.P.No.472 of 2010 pending on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam, was 2. 2 : ^ disposed of on 16.03.2023, granting maintenance of Rs.5,000/- to the respondent No.2. The Criminal Revision Case has been filed challenging the orders granting interim maintenance to the respondent No.2 in Crl.M.P.No.69 of 2010 in O.P.No.472 of 2010 on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam. 3. \ In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent No.2 that the main O.P. itself was disposed of on 16.03.2023, nothing remains in this instant Criminal Revision Case. Criminal Revision Case is liable to be dismissed as infructuous. 4. Therefore, the 5. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. X Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To ^ Court, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam Jrarav'^amiVS?) High Court of Andhra 3. One CC to Smt S A V Ratnam, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri Y Sudhakar, Advocate [OPUC] ^ Arrfarava^hr Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh 6. Three CD Copies District. (With Pradesh, at TK TF HIGH COURT DATED;02/05/2025 ORDER I ? .r M 20/5 5“''™* Seciion ^ CRLRC.No.1452 of 2011 m. c©/ X DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS INFRUCTUOUS