- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5365 WP No. 108062 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 108062 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: THE DEFENCE ESTATE OFFICER, KARNATAKA AND GOA CIRCLE, T/56, ASSYE LINE, K.KAMARAJ ROAD, BANGALORE-42. …PETITIONER (BY MRS. DIVYA ACHARI., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VENKATESH.M.KHARVI., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. 1(a) SHRI. SHRIKANT PUTTU NAIK SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LR’S, SMT.DURGABAI W/O SHRIKANT NAIK, AGE: 56 YEARS, 1(b) DEEPAK SHRIKANT NAIK, AGE: 29 YEARS, 1(c) VINAYA SHRIKANTH NAIK AGE: 28 YEARS, 1(d) GOURISH SHRIKANT NAIK AGE: 24 YEARS, 2. DELETED 3. BHIKARO @ SADANAND PUTTU NAIK AGE: 58 YEARS, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5365 WP No. 108062 of 2023 4. GANAPATI TUKARAM NAIK AGE: 46 YEARS, 5. RADHBAI TELU NAIK AGE: 87 YEARS, 6. SMT. MANJULA VAIKUNT NAIK AGE: 56 YEARS, 7. SMT. JANABAI CHANDRAHAS NAIK AGE: 54 YEARS, 8(a) SUDHAKAR NEEMA NAIK AGE: 52 YEARS, 8(b) GIRISH @ GOURISH NEMA NAIK AGE: 50 YEARS, 8(c) SMT. RANJAN @ SHWETA W/O ANANADU NAIK AGE: 48 YEARS, 9. SMT. PARVATI MERU NAIK DELETED 10. KASHINATH MERU NAIK AGE: 63 YEARS, 11. SOMANATH MERU NAIK AGE: 56 YEARS, ALL ARE R/O CHENDIYA, TQ: KARWAR, DIST: UTTARA KANNADA. 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, PROJECT SEABIRD NAVAL BASE, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, UTTAR KANNNADA-581 301. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5365 WP No. 108062 of 2023 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed before Addl. Registrar (Judicial) and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the petition was listed before the Court on 12.03.2025, on that day, finally a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the petition under the caption ‘for dismissal of petition for non- compliance of office objections’ on 24.03.2025. The petition is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of petition for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the petitioner has not complied with the office objections. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. In view of peremptory order dated 12.03.2025, the petition is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE CLK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43