Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47904 (AP)

Velagapudi Seshagiri Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/5199/2021 · 2025-10-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010090522021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5199 OF 2021 Between: 1. Velagapudi Seshagiri Rao,, S/o Venkaiah, R/o 23-158, Bose Statue Center, Yanamalakuduru, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh State. 2. Nekkalapudi Bala Koteswara Rao,, S/o. Surya Bhaskara Rao, R/o 1-17, Balaji Nagar, Tadigadapa, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh State. ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner Of Police, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 3. Station House Officer, Penamaluru Police Station, Vijayawada City, Krishna District ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: KILARU NITHIN KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5199 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent herein in calling the petitioners to the Police Station and detaining the petitioners for long hours in the Police Station when the dispute is absolutely civil in nature as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct-4 pile respondents to refrain from calling the petitioners to police station without any valid reason…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.10.2025. Dvs HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.5199 of 2021 Dated.08.10.2025 Dvs 230