[2025:RJ-JP:42919] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16004/2025 Omprakash Gautam S/o Shri Rajaram Gautam, Aged About 39 Years, R/o House No.197, Dream Land Colony, Hanumangarh Junction, District Hanumangasrh ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Technical Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur 2. Director, Department Of Skill Development And Entrepreneurship, Board Of Technical Education Jodhpdur 3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, State Agriculture Management Institution Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur Rajasthan Through Secretary ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Malpura For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pulkit Bhardwaj for Mr. Aditya Singh, DY. GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/10/2025 1. Mr. Pulkit Bhardwaj accepts notice on behalf of Mr. Aditya Singh, Dy. GC for respondent No.1 and 2. Office is directed to reflect his name as counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner is directed to serve him a copy of petition. 3. Instant Writ Petition is preferred with following prayer:- a) By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof the impugned order dated 03.10.2025 whereby the petitioner has been declared as ineligible may kindly be quashed and set aside to the extent of the petitioner and the respondents may kindly be directed to consider the qualification and eligibility of the petitioner as equivalent as prescribed in the Advertisement and to give appointment to the petitioner on the post of Junior Instructor in pursuance to the direct [2025:RJ-JP:42919] (2 of 3) [CW-16004/2025] Recruitment of Junior Instructor dated 05.03.2024 with all consequential benefits. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is a qualified candidate and provisionally he was found eligible but his appointment was put on hold on the ground that petitioner does not possess requisite qualification in relation to computers. He further submits that the petitioner has submitted his mark-sheet wherein paper Nos. BLIS-103 and 203 are related to computer and information technology. He further submits that the requirement of respondent is only for basic knowledge of computers and same is fulfilled from the course undergone by present petitioner but the candidature of petitioner was rejected merely on ground of non-fulfilment of computer related qualification. 5. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has also procured a certificate of (RS-CIT) from Vardhman Mahaveer Open University, Kota in April, 2018 and it is sufficient to fulfill qualification criterion prescribed in the advertisement. 6. Learned counsel for respondent suggests that petitioner may submit a representation and same will be considered within norms as prescribed for recruitment. 7. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to respondent within a period of four weeks from now raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 3 weeks from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if [2025:RJ-JP:42919] (3 of 3) [CW-16004/2025] petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has right to re-approach the court with fresh petition. 8. With aforesaid, writ petition along with pending application(s), if any stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /09