Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4790 (UTT)

SUMIT ANAND v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/88/2025 · 2025-06-04

Alok Mahra, G Narendar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 12.09.2025 Correction Application (MCC No.02 of 2025) IN WPSB No. 88 of 2025 Hon'ble G. Narendar, C.J. Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Shubhang Dobhal, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Gajendra Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 3. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the Review Applicant. Correction Application (MCC No.02 of 2025) 4. This application has been preferred by the respondent- Nigam to correct the words “Managing Director of the Corporation” to be read as “Chief General Manager of the Corporation”. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no objection. 6. In that view, correction application is allowed. Registry to replace the words “Managing Director of the Corporation” with the words “Chief General Manager of the Corporation” in the order and issue a certificate copy of the corrected order. (Alok Mahra, J.) (G. Narendar, C.J.) 12.09.2025 12.09.2025 NISHANT