Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4790 (PNJ)

DR GURPRIT SINGH BATH v. MS SHRUTI SINGH IAS AND OTHERS

COCP/1578/2025 · 2026-04-08

Nidhi Gupta

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 212 Dr. Gurpr Ms. Shruti CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o ordinate B Gurprit Sin petition wa counsel for notice date office of t considerati decided by COCP-1578-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.1578 o Date of decision urprit Singh Bath Versus Shruti Singh, IAS and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. R.K. Arora, Sr. Advocate Mr. Shivam Ahuja, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Respondent No.4-Dr. Gurinde Maharaja Ranjit Singh Punjab person with Mr. S.S. Bhinder, Bhinder, Advocate for respond HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 11.12.2024 (Anne ate Bench of this Court in CWP rit Singh Bath vs. State of Punjab ion was disposed of on the basis of s for the respondents to the effect dated 25.11.2024 (Annexure P-16) of the concerned authorities and eration with the authorities conc d by the competent authority withi 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 1578 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-08.04.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA ocate with ocate i, AAG Punjab. urinder Pal Singh Brar, Registrar, unjab Technical University, in inder, Advocate and Mr. D.S. espondents No.3 and 4. ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- CWP-33397-2024 titled as “Dr. unjab and others”, whereby the is of statements made by learned effect that “…in case, the legal 16) has been received in the and the same is still pending concerned, the same will be ithin a period of eight weeks VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.10 17.51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document from the d appropriat case, it is f will be ac accepting passed and date of he Singh, Re 24.2.2026 h through the Writ Court 3/3) has b 23.2.2026 Board of G the petition Speaking O also requir 23.2.2026, (Annexure instructions Court, sub COCP-1578-2025 (O & M) he date of receipt of certified copy o riate speaking order. Learned cou t is found feasible to accept the claim e accepted, otherwise due reasons ing the claim of the petitioner in and the said order will be duly conv In compliance of the order d of hearing i.e. 24.2.2026 short affid h, Registrar, MRSPTU, Bathinda .2026 had been filed in Court. Learned Senior Counsel for gh the said affidavit and has submitte Court order, a Speaking Order date has been passed. It is pointed out .2026 has been passed by the respond d of Governors dated 23.2.2026”. L etitioner prays that in order to lay king Order dated 23.2.2026 (Annexur require a copy of the decision of the .2026, on the basis of which, the Speak exure R-3/3) has been passed. Learned counsel for respo uctions from respondent No.4, who is p t, submits that the copy of the d 2 opy of this order by passing an counsel further submits that in claim of the petitioner, the same ons will be mentioned for not r in the speaking order to be conveyed to the petitioner…..” rder dated 18.8.2025, on the last rt affidavit of Dr. Gurinder Pal thinda-respondent No.4 dated el for the petitioner has gone bmitted that in compliance of the r dated 23.2.2026 (Annexure R- d out that the said order dated spondents “upon approval of the 6”. Learned Senior Counsel for o lay effective challenge to the nexure R-3/3), the petitioner will of the Board of Governors dated Speaking Order dated 23.2.2026 respondents No.3 and 4, on ho is present in person before the the decision of the Board of VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.10 17.51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Governors appropriate made by le from respo submits tha and the sam April 08, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-1578-2025 (O & M) ernors dated 23.2.2026 shall be supplie opriate application moved by him. Heard. In view of the facts noted a by learned counsel for respondents respondent No.4, learned Senior C its that nothing more survives in the he same may be disposed of as such. Ordered accordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, , 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 3 supplied to the petitioner upon an oted above and the submissions dents No.3 and 4 on instructions nior Counsel for the petitioner in the present contempt petition such. if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.10 17.51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document