Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:107827 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12451 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sanjay Singh Alias Sanjay Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 20 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs: "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for record of the case, quash the impugned order dated 21.3.2025 (Annexure no. 1) passed by the Prescribed Authority/ Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, District - Mathura (Respondent no. 2). (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities not to make interfere in peacefully performing the statutory duty of officer of the elected Pradhan of the petitioner. (iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the authorities illegally not deprived to the petitioner from his constitutional or statutory right of the reservation of the Scheduled Caste and treat the petitioner belongs to Dhangar Caste as he declared and certified/notified before passing the impugned order." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an elected Pradhan of Gram Panchayat Bati, Block Mathura, District - Mathura. 3. It is submitted that the petitioner is aggrieved with the ex parte order dated 21.3.2025 passed by respondent no. 2 by which the election was set aside on the application made by the complainant that the petitioner has placed fabricated caste certificate before the election commission. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred the portion of the impugned order in which it is stated that the said election of the petitioner was set aside with the contention that cancellation of the said fabricated caste certificate is under challenge before the High Court and if the High Court grants any stay order on the said cancellation order dated 12.4.2024 then the impugned order will automatically stand cancelled. It is further submitted that the said cancellation order dated 12.4.2024 was challenged in Writ-C No. 9046 of 2025 before the co-ordinate Bench of this Court. While taking into consideration the submissions of the counsel and contents made in the writ petition, the Court vide order dated 4.6.2025 has stayed some portion of the order dated 20.5.2024 passed by respondent no. 2 and orders dated 12.4.2024 and 30.1.2024 passed by respondent no. 3. 5. It is next submitted that since the order of cancellation has already been stayed by the Court, the order impugned automatically stands cancelled. Taking into consideration of the order passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the instant writ petition may be disposed of. 6. Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has no objection on the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner and has also not opposed the submissions regarding interim order by which the cancellation order was stayed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court. 7. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned counsel for respondent no. 3, perused the contents of the writ petition as well as the material on record. I have also perused the order dated 21.3.2025 passed by the Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Mathura. For ready reference the order dated 21.3.2025 is quoted hereinbelow:- आदेश पत्रावली का अनुशीलन किकया गया, प्रतिवादी द्वारा जाति प्रमाण पत्र की वमान में वैधा हेु माननीय उच्च न्यायालय में लम्बि%& थाकथिथ रिरट का ही मात्र अपुष्ट कथन किकया गया है। वादी द्वारा जाति प्रमाण पत्र वैध न होने के कई थ्य व साक्ष्य प्रस्ु किकये गए, जो पत्रावलिल हैं। वाद 28.05.2021 से लम्बि%& है। किवस्ृ &हस सुनने व पत्रावली के अुशीलन करने पर उपरोक्त किववचन से मैं इस किनष्कर्ष पर पहुंचा हूँ किक प्रतिवादी पक्ष का अपुष्ट कथन होे हुए भी उभयपक्षों के लिलए प्राकृ तिक न्याय का सिसद्धां आकिद का अनुसरण करे हुये परम न्याय किह में, यकिद प्रतिवादी श्री संजय के किनरस् अनुसूतिच जाति के प्रमाण पत्र की वैधा से सं&ंतिध माननीय उच्च न्यायालय में आज की तिथिथ में कोई वाद लम्बि%& है (प्रतिवादी पक्ष के अपुष्ट कथनानुसार) एवं यह वाद इस न्यायालय के इस किनणय को आज की तिथिथ में इस प्रकार नकारात्मक प्रभाकिव करा है किक किनरस् जाति प्रमाण पत्र ही पुनजीकिव/स्थगन हो जाये ो सिजसके संदर्भिभ स्वः ही यह आदेश के किनरस् होने के सश आदेश पारिर किकया जाा है किक किनरस् /किनष्प्रभावी अनुसूतिच जाति के प्रमाण पत्र के आधार पर अनुसूतिच जाति हेु आरतिक्ष सीट पर किनवातिच ग्राम प्रधान श्री संजय का किनवचन किनरस् किकया जाा है। वादी की दलील सुनने के &ाद वादी को स्थाकिप करने का कोई पयाप्त आधार नहीं पाया जाा है। उक्त पद आकम्बिस्मक रिरक्त हो गया है। अः उक्त पत्रावली वाद आवश्यक कायवाही दालिLल दफ्र हो। 21.03.2025 उप सिजलातिधकारी मथुरा 2 8. Taking into consideration the contents made in the impugned order and the order dated 4.6.2025 passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court, I am agreed with the argument as advanced by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner that since cancellation of the fabricated caste certificate, order has already been stayed by the co- ordinate Bench of this Court, therefore, nothing left for further adjudication in the matter. 9. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 8.7.2025 S.K.S. (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) 3 Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad