APHC010404642010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 19687/2010 Between: 1. GURRAM NARAYANA RAO, S/O. SESHAIAH R/O. H.NO. 2-14, AMMIREDDIGUDEM VILLAGE, GAMPALAGUDEM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA REP BY ITS DEPUTY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, LOKNAYAK BHAVAN, (HYDERABAD FF CELL) , NEW DELHI 2. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS, JOINT SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT , REVENUE (FF) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARAIT, HYDERABAD ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents keeping pending the application of petitioner for Swatantra Sainik Samman Pension since 2000 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of object of the scheme itself and consequently direct the respondent to consider the application of petitioner for grant of pension under Swatantra Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, and to pass 2 JS,J W.P.No.19687/2010 IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP 24954 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to reconsider the case of petitioner for granting pension under Swatantra Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 4 OF 2010(WPMP 104233 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 5 OF 2010(WPMP 104575 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THENEPALLI NIRANJAN SC FOR CENTRAL. GOVT 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3 JS,J W.P.No.19687/2010 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 12.11.2025 KAS 4 JS,J W.P.No.19687/2010 255 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 19687/2010 Dated: 12.11.2025 KAS