Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47875 (AP)

Bheemarasetti Pydiahnaidu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/13401/2020 · 2025-09-24

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010205102020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 13401/2020 Between: 1. BHEEMARASETTI PYDIAHNAIDU,, S/O LATE ADINARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O MADUGULA VILLAGE AND ACHUTAPURAM MANDALAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. MARISETTI SIRISHA,, W/O. SITARAM, HINDU, AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/O. HARIPALEM VILLAGE, ACHUTHAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (REVENUE), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, MADUGULA MANDALAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 4. THE MADUGULA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, MADUGULA VILLAGE AND ATCHUTHAPURAM MANDALAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT REP BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.13401 of 2020 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P RAJASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.13401 of 2020 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 to 3. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in interfering with the petitioners’ peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Grama Kantham land admeasuring an extent of Ac.0-40 cents in Sy.No.241/3 situated in Madugula Village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District for distribution of house sites under the <Navaratnalu-Pedalandariki Illu= program. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the respondent authorities concerned will follow the due procedure with respect to the subject land. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed to deal with the subject land in an extent of Ac.0-40 cents in Sy.No.241/3 situated in Madugula Village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, strictly in accordance with law, if so warranted for any public purpose and if the petitioners are otherwise found to be in possession of the same, they shall be dealt with strictly in accordance with law by hearing all the parties concerned, including the petitioners, upon verification of the records and the subject land an appropriate decision shall be taken on its own merits as expeditiously as possible. Any dispossession from the subject land shall not be made except by following the due process of law. 4 HBKM,J W.P.No.13401 of 2020 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 25.09.2025 PGT