Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47873 (AP)

KIRAN UNNAM v. ACHARYA N.G.R.AGRL. UNIVERSITY,GUNTUR DIST,& 2

WP/35558/2016 · 2025-09-24

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010840022016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION Between: Kiran Unnam AND Acharya N G R Agrl University Guntur Dist 2 and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K S V SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. YELLA REDDY RAJANALA (SC FOR ANGRAU) 2. B JITHENDER (SC FOR CENTRAL GOVT. COUNSEL) 3. HARINATH N (DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 35558/2016 ...PETITIONER Acharya N G R Agrl University Guntur Dist 2 and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): YELLA REDDY RAJANALA (SC FOR ANGRAU) JITHENDER (SC FOR CENTRAL GOVT. COUNSEL) HARINATH N (DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3504] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 MRK,J W.P.No.35558 of 2016 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner seeking the following main relief : “….to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus and declare that the notification vide Advt. No.5/RC/2016 dated 25.09.2016 is contrary to the regulations framed by the respondents; a) declare the action of the 1st respondent in deleting the B.Sc Agriculture qualification from the zone of consideration for the post of Assistant Professor in Veterinary as arbitrary, illegal and violative of U.G.C regulations besides violation of Article 14, 16 of Constitution of India; b) declare that the petitioner is fully eligible and qualified as per the regulations framed by the respondents 2 and 3 for the post of Assistant Professor in Veterniary Extension; c) direct the 1st respondent university to permit the petitioner to appear for the selection process and permit him to appear for the selections by duly treating him to be fully eligible and qualified for appointment to the post of Assistant Professor in veterniary extension and upon such consideration if the petitioner is selected then appoint the petitioner as an Assistant Professor in veterniary extension with all consequential benefits difficulties in the interest of justice....” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Challa Hrudaya Raj, learned counsel representing Sri K.S.V.Subba Rao, learned counsel for the 3 MRK,J W.P.No.35558 of 2016 petitioner submitted that in view of subsequent events taken place in the lis, the relief in the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 25.09.2025 GRL 4 MRK,J W.P.No.35558 of 2016 155 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.35558 of 2016 Date: 25.09.2025 5 MRK,J W.P.No.35558 of 2016 GRL