TEJPAL SINGH ALIAS TEJPAL SINGH SOHI AND ORS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/21609/2025 · 2025-09-10
Yashvir Singh Rathor
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47871 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47871 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-21609-2025 1 271
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-21609-2025 Date of Decision: 10.09.2025 TEJPAL SINGH ALIAS TEJPAL SINGH SOHI AND ORS
......... Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER …..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present : Mr. K.S. Dargan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rahul Jindal, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Harmanbir S. Sandhu, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR
, J. (Oral)
1. Prayer in this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C is for quashing of DDR/G.D. No. 31 (Annexure P-1) dated 13.06.2023 under Sections 323 and 34 of IPC and Sections 325 and 201, IPC added later on registered at Police Station Sadar Raikot in FIR No.0068 (Annexure P-2) dated 15/06/2023, under Sections 324, 323 and 34 of IPC and sections, 326 and 201 of IPC added later on registered at Police Station Sadar Raikot, District Ludhiana Rural and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise. 2. This Court vide order dated 17.07.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send ASGAR ALI 2025.09.10 17:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-21609-2025 2 his/her report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jagraon and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 28.07.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 6. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant F.I.R. following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 titled as ‘Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another’ and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in (2012) 10 SCC 303 titled as ‘Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others’, this petition is allowed and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise qua petitioner(s), are hereby quashed.
(YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR) JUDGE 10.09.2025 Ali Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No ASGAR ALI 2025.09.10 17:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document