APHC010079272025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 453/2025 Between: 1. SHAIK RAMIJA, W/O MASTHAN SAHEB AGED ABOUT 55YEARS. 2. PIDUGU GOVINDU KONDALARAYUDU, S/O SIDDAREDDY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS. 3. PATNAM SANTEYYA, S/O SUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 4. MODAM PEDDDA TIRUPAALU, S/O NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. 5. MODERN LAKSHMI DEVI, S/O YANADAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 6. MODEM NARAYANA, S/O SANTEIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 7. MODEM CHINA TIRUPALU, S/O NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 8. PIDUGU PEDDA SUBBA REDDY, S/O KONDA REDDY AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS. 9. PATNAM SANTAIAH, S/O SUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 10. PATNAN SUBBAIAH, S/O SUBBAIAH AGED 66 YEARS. 11. MODAM OBULAMMA, W/O KRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 12. MODAM NAGAMMA, W/O KRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. 13. NELATURI PEERAIAH, S/O NASEEDDI AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. 14. MADALLAPALLE PRAKASHAM, S/O VENKATA SUBBAIAH AGED 2 ABOUT 48 YEARS. 15. MODEM PEDDA TIRUPAALU, S/O NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. 16. PIDUGU CHINNAPA REDDY, S/O KONDA REDDY AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS. 17. SANTHANI RAMA KRISHNA REDDY, W/O PULLA REDDY AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS. 18. DUNNATHALA SAYAMMA, W/O PENCHAL REDDY AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS. 19. GANDIKOTA SUBBALAKSHUMMA, W/O VENKATA SUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 20. NARAYANURI PRAKHASAM, S/O LAKSHMI NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 21. RAJUPALEM SUBBAIAH, S/O SESHAIAH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS. 22. DUNNUTHULA NARA SIMHA REDDY, S/O PENCHALA REDDY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. 23. .DANNUTHALA NARASA REDDY, S/O RAMA SUBBA REDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 24. RAJUPALEN CHINNA SUBBAIAH, S/O SUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. 25. PIDUGU THELLAIAHGARI RAMI REDDY, S/O CHINNA KONDA REDDY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 26. RAJUPALEM VENKATA SUBBAMMA, W/O CHINNA SUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 27. .PIDUGA RAMACHANDRA REDDY, S/O KONDAREDDY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 28. DUNNUTALA PAPUGARI SUBBA LAKSHMAMMA, W/O YELLA REDDY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 29. PENNED KRISHNA THULASI, W/O SREENIVASULU AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 30. DUNNUTHALA BORAMGARI NARAYANA REDDY, S/O YELLAIAH 3 AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. 31. RENA KONDAMMA, W/O PICHI REDDY AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS. . 32. DUNNUTHALA AYYAVARAMMA, W/O NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 33. PIDUGU ESWARAMMA, W/O CHINNA SUBBA REDDY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 34. PIDUGU CHINNAPPA REDDY, S/O KONDA REDDY AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS. 35. ARENA NARASIMHA REDDY, S/O PICHIREDDY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 36. DUNNUTHALA SRINIVASA REDDY, W/O CHINNAYELLA REDDY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 37. PIDUGU CHINNAPA REDDY, S/O KONDA REDDY AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS. 38. BATHALA VENKASUBBAMMA, W/O NAGA RAJU AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 39. ADURI MUNENANAA, W/O VEERA BHADRA REDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 40. PIDDUGU CHINNAPAREDDY, S/O KONDAREDDY AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS. . 41. PIDUGU TELLAIAHAGARI VENKATA SUBBANAINA, W/O SIDDHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 42. DUNNATALA BORANAGARI YELLAREDDY, . S/O RANAI REDDY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 43. .ADURI VEERABHADRA REDDY, W/O PULLAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 44. OBILI KRISHNAIAH, S/O MADHAR SAB AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. 45. BATHALA RAJA, S/O RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS. 46. VALLUM VEERABRAHNAAYYA, S/O SIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 4 47. MADDELAPALLI PRAKASHAM, S/O VENKATA SUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI G SRINIVASULU IAS, THE SPECIAL COLLECTOR, GALERU NAGARI SRUJALA SRAVANTI PROJECT, NEW COLLECTORATE,KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. SRI A VENKATESU, THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND ACQUISITION,UNIT-LL,TELUGU GANGA PROJECT, NEW COLLECTORATE,KADAPA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for willful, wanton, disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble High Court dated 05.03.2024 passed in W.P.No.5736 of 2024 by the Hon'ble Lordships, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to permit to implead the proposed respondent as Respondent No 3 in CC No 453 of 2025 and also pending miscellaneous petitions therein on the file of this Honble High Court, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VALLEPU JAGADEESH Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. MANNAM VENKATA KRISHNA RAO The Court made the following: 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.453 of 2025 ORDER: This Court, vide order dated 05.03.2024, disposed of the W.P.No.5736 of 2024, directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 therein to examine the representation dated 11.04.2019 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, and communicate the same to the petitioners, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. For non-compliance of the said order, present contempt case has been filed. 2. Precisely, representation is submitted for payment of Solatium on the enhanced compensation and interest amount on the Additional Market Value. 3. The 2nd respondent-Special Deputy Collector (LA) (FAC), TGP Unit-II, Kadapa, vide proceedings dated 01.03.2025, disposed of the representation by relying on orders passed in W.P.Nos.23443 and 23447 of 2010, and suggested the petitioners to file Execution Petition before the competent civil Court. 4. Learned counsel for petitioners requested that a similar order be passed as in C.C.No.451 of 2025, wherein the learned Single Judge of this Court, while closing the contempt case, granted liberty to the petitioners therein to file an Execution Petition before the competent civil Court. 5. The Hon’ble Apex Court in R.N.Dey and others v. Bhagyabati Pramanik and others 1 held that proper forum to execute the award is competent civil Court. 1 (2000) 4 SCC 400 6 6. Therefore, the present Contempt Case is closed granting liberty to petitioners to approach competent Civil Court for execution of the award. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 02.12.2025 KBN 7 119 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.453 of 2025 02.12.2025 KKBBNN