IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 232 CWP-2771-2004 (O&M) Date of Decision.:04.02.2025 Sham Lal Pe11oner Vs. PUNSUP and Another Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: None for the peoner. Mr. Surya Kumar, AAG, Punjab. Mr. H.S. Randhawa, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) There is no representaon on behalf of the peoner. Similar was the posion on the last date of hearing i.e. 03.12.2024 and on the previous date i.e. 01.10.2024. Fresh noce sent to the peoner has been received back unserved with a report of incomplete address. No other address is available except the address as menoned in memo of pares. In these circumstances, the present peon is hereby dismissed in default for want of prosecuon. ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE February 04, 2025 Neeka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2025.02.04 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document