Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47865 (PNJ)

SACHIN v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR

CRM-M/21247/2025 · 2025-07-28

Rajesh Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 216 SACHIN STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR CORAM: Present: RAJESH BHARDWAJ 1. the petitioner in a case FIR No. Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023 Jind. 2. protection, the petitioner was directed to join the investigation. 3. petitioner has joined the investigation and fully cooperated with and thus, the interim order may kindly be made absolute. 4. Singh, has affirmed the fact that the petitioner has joined the investigation and he is no more required for further investigatio 5. order dated as envisaged under Section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha 2023. July 28, 2025 Mohit Bishnoi Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SACHIN Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. J1USTICE Mr. Virender Singh Punia, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Diya Sodhi, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Rajesh K. Kataria, Advocate for the ***** RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) Prayer in the present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case FIR No.212 dated 109(1) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023, By virtue of order dated 24.04 protection, the petitioner was directed to join the investigation. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation and fully cooperated with and thus, the interim order may kindly be made absolute. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI has affirmed the fact that the petitioner has joined the investigation no more required for further investigatio In view of the above, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 24.04.2025 is made absolute subject to compliance of as envisaged under Section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha 28, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH CRM-M-21247-2025 Date of Decision: 28.07.2025 ...Petitioner Versus ...Respondent USTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ , Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Diya Sodhi, Sr. DAG, Haryana. , Advocate for the complainant. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to dated 27.07.2024, registered under , at Police Station Safidon, District 24.04.2025, while granting interim protection, the petitioner was directed to join the investigation. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation and fully cooperated with the same and thus, the interim order may kindly be made absolute. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Sukhdev has affirmed the fact that the petitioner has joined the investigation no more required for further investigation. In view of the above, the present petition is allowed and the is made absolute subject to compliance of conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, (RAJESH BHARDWAJ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 28.07.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondent Prayer in the present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to , registered under , District , while granting interim Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the the same Sukhdev has affirmed the fact that the petitioner has joined the investigation In view of the above, the present petition is allowed and the conditions Sanhita, MOHIT 2025.07.29 07:05